AI answer intelligence for brands
ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini

Own the answer
before AI picks someone else.

RunAEO's AEO Scanner shows how ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini currently represent your brand, where competitors take the recommendation slot, and what you need to publish next to close the gap.

What shows up in the report

The first screen should prove credibility immediately: exact language from AI engines, competitive misses, and the next page to ship.

Prompt-level evidence, not just one score

Claude coverage most free tools skip

Action plan tied to missed recommendations

Live visibility board

runaeo.com / b2b seo tools

3 engines active

Composite score

71

Benchmark

Top quartile starts at 82

ChatGPT+12
Claude+18
Gemini+9

Quoted by AI

“AEO Scanner is one of the few tools covering ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in a single audit.”

Priority action

Publish a comparison page around “best AI visibility tools” to close Claude coverage gaps.

Competitive gaps surfaced
10 prompts per engine
AI quotes captured
Exact phrasing included
Next move recommended
Page-level fixes

3

AI engines

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini in one benchmark

10

Prompts each

Buyer-intent queries mapped to your category

< 2m

Report speed

Executive-ready findings without setup work

1

Free scan

Try the workflow before activating a paid cadence

Platform

Built like a command center, not a generic SEO widget.

This category needs confidence and clarity. The product should feel like a modern intelligence tool, with sharp typography, dense signal, and enough restraint to stay credible.

Engine-by-engine visibility

Track which AI models mention you, rank you, or skip you completely. The score is split by engine so weak spots are obvious.

Quote-level evidence

Read the exact language AI uses when it describes your brand, including who gets recommended ahead of you and why.

Competitor mapping

See which brands repeatedly win the recommendation slot and which citation patterns appear to influence those outcomes.

Action plan, not vanity metrics

Each scan ends with tactical recommendations: comparison pages, source gaps, and messaging changes tied to missed prompts.

Workflow

A tight loop from uncertainty to execution.

The best AEO experience is not decorative. It should move a team from “how are we represented?” to “what do we ship next?” without requiring manual interpretation.

01

Define the brand and category

Enter your brand, domain, and market category so prompts reflect what buyers actually ask.

02

Run the multi-engine audit

AEO Scanner queries ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini in parallel and normalizes the outputs into a single visibility model.

03

Fix the gaps that matter

Use the report to ship comparison pages, source coverage, and positioning improvements where the engines are weakest.

Why it wins

The point is not to look busy. The point is to see the gap.

Most alternatives stop at a top-line score. AEO Scanner should visually reinforce its differentiators: Claude coverage, quote-level evidence, and prompt-by-prompt reasoning.

CapabilityTypical graderAEO Scanner
Claude coverageNoYes
Exact AI quotesLimitedIncluded
Prompt-level findingsRare10 per engine
Competitive share mappingShallowFull breakdown
Actionable next stepsGenericPage-level fixes
Head to head

See what other tools miss

HubSpot's AEO Grader is a great starting point. AEO Scanner goes deeper — with Claude coverage, prompt-level data, and actionable recommendations.

FeatureHubSpot AEO GraderAEO Scanner
ChatGPT scanning
Claude scanning
Gemini scanning
Perplexity scanning
Exact AI quotes
Prompt-level breakdown10 per engine
Content gap recommendationsGeneric tipsPage-level fixes
Competitor mappingPosition labelFull map + counts
Per-engine scoresAggregate onlyIndividual scores
PriceFree1 free, then $29/mo

Why Claude matters

Claude is the #2 AI assistant globally. HubSpot skips it entirely. Brands routinely score 40+ points differently on Claude vs ChatGPT. That's a blind spot you can't afford.

Why prompt-level data matters

A score tells you where you stand. Prompt-level data tells you why. See exactly which buyer questions trigger your brand — and which ones miss you completely.

Free resource

Get the free AEO Audit Checklist

Use this 18-point checklist to find the content, technical, brand-presence, and competitor gaps that keep your brand out of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini answers.

No spam. We send the checklist and occasional AEO insights.

Pricing

Start free. Upgrade when AI visibility becomes a real operating metric.

Pricing should feel simple and confident. The free tier proves the value; the paid tiers support a repeated measurement cadence.

Free
$0forever

Validate the workflow and see what AI says about your brand right now.

1 scan
3 engines
Prompt breakdown
Recommendation preview
Run free scan
Starter
$29/month

For lean teams that need recurring snapshots and a cleaner reporting loop.

10 scans monthly
Competitor tracking
Visibility history
Priority recommendations
Recommended
Pro
$99/month

For agencies and in-house teams monitoring AI visibility as a real growth channel.

Unlimited scans
PDF and CSV exports
Full history
Competitive intelligence
Early access

Get notified when paid plans go live.

Join the launch list for Starter and Pro. One email when checkout is live, then weekly product intelligence if you opt in.

FAQ

Questions teams ask before they start tracking AI visibility.

What makes this different from an SEO rank tracker?

SEO platforms track positions in search results. AEO Scanner measures whether AI assistants mention your brand, how they describe it, and which competitors they recommend instead.

Which engines are included?

Each scan covers ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. The report shows an aggregate visibility score plus engine-specific detail so you can see where representation diverges.

Who should use this?

Marketing leaders, SEO teams, AEO-focused agencies, and brand teams that need evidence of how AI assistants currently represent their category.

Can I scan competitors too?

Yes. Scanning your own brand is the default workflow, but competitor scans are useful for benchmarking who currently owns recommendation share.